From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <880e0bdcca58d6900aa423397baa9a0b@quanstro.net> From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:47:16 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: <20090325203753.OWIB10385.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] request for more GSoC project suggestions Topicbox-Message-UUID: c55b84be-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Mar 25 16:39:16 EDT 2009, cmbrannon@cox.net wrote: > > > Gogo reimplementation of cfront. > > > > i'm pretty sure c++ has "advanced" to the point where > > the cfront implementation technique is unworkable. > > The Comeau C++ compiler [1] uses the cfront technique, doesn't it? It is > supposed to be very standards-compliant. > > [1] http://www.comeaucomputing.com where do they claim this? i see a claim that they accept cfront-isms, but that's a different claim. - erik