From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <880e140325328528238a54774534384f@acl.lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] vnc[vs] implementation question
From: andrey mirtchovski <andrey@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:54:30 -0600
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2d161c4-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>
> do you have a better way?
>

no. I was simply curious as to why it's done this way.

the performance of vncv is quite good, so I wanted to see if I it does
anything differently with the libdraw routines, possibly something
that could easily be accomodated for other programs, say, XaoS, which
do exhibit jitter...