From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <880f784f3ea9dbf26e7dc28144d9f412@felloff.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:19:21 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <6937de4085b01a0329d78f02963aba5f@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] mulgen botch
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cdb9ff2e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

sorry... the code from the last mail contains an error...
theres a missing regfree() in the OASMUL and OASLMUL case when
hardleft is set. in any case, i'm unsure if it wouldnt be
better to handle this in mulgen() instead. as this case is
so rare, it is probably not worth trying to avoid useless
register moves here.

--
cinap