* [9fans] caught by replica
@ 2003-03-18 18:04 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-03-18 18:14 ` Russ Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros @ 2003-03-18 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
It seems that the reason why we're not getting the scheduler fix is
that apparently we already have it, sic.
What happen was that in a pull we got a disconnection from the network.
It seems that the files got added to the log, and not to the data base.
Since plan9.time was updated, replica is no longer pulling them.
We're fixing our problem by hand but I thought I should let others know.
hth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] caught by replica
2003-03-18 18:04 [9fans] caught by replica Fco.J.Ballesteros
@ 2003-03-18 18:14 ` Russ Cox
2003-03-18 18:21 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2003-03-18 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> It seems that the reason why we're not getting the scheduler fix is
> that apparently we already have it, sic.
>
> What happen was that in a pull we got a disconnection from the network.
> It seems that the files got added to the log, and not to the data base.
> Since plan9.time was updated, replica is no longer pulling them.
I can't figure out how that could happen.
If you got disconnected then the copy operations
should have failed. If they fail, then the time is
not updated.
Are you sure you didn't run pull -c to ignore the changes?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] caught by replica
2003-03-18 18:14 ` Russ Cox
@ 2003-03-18 18:21 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros @ 2003-03-18 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]
It could be I was running a pull -c for a subset of the files.
Do you know the effect of a network disconnection while doing that?
Could it affect the status of files not being pulled -c that are
in the same batch?
After thinking it twice, I think I agree that it cannot happen,
so I think it all had to be a mistake on my side, sic.
thanks a lot
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1930 bytes --]
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] caught by replica
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:14:47 -0500
Message-ID: <8842bdd8e931605322b284d9f00a61f3@plan9.bell-labs.com>
> It seems that the reason why we're not getting the scheduler fix is
> that apparently we already have it, sic.
>
> What happen was that in a pull we got a disconnection from the network.
> It seems that the files got added to the log, and not to the data base.
> Since plan9.time was updated, replica is no longer pulling them.
I can't figure out how that could happen.
If you got disconnected then the copy operations
should have failed. If they fail, then the time is
not updated.
Are you sure you didn't run pull -c to ignore the changes?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-18 18:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-18 18:04 [9fans] caught by replica Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-03-18 18:14 ` Russ Cox
2003-03-18 18:21 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).