From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Sat,  6 Dec 2008 17:39:34 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <886d4a4c38582b9f2b526f90345e2c9b@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <d1c554290812061427j6fbcfe55i2c4c7bfa9bab878@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cca2e5880812061244m4ea907e5v81b8c4ca2c397b75@mail.gmail.com>
	<cca2e5880812061417j4265bad7g9bf960742c80ad62@mail.gmail.com>
	<d1c554290812061427j6fbcfe55i2c4c7bfa9bab878@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Explanation of binding from ftpfs
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5c1aaf66-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> if I understand it correctly, the reference to the server is still
> there even if you don't see /n/ftp anymore.
>
> iru

yes, the reference is the other location.  there is no
heirarchy of mounts/binds.  tthere is no "master"
that if removed will remove the whole thing.
they are simply reference counted.

- erik