From: Matthias Teege <mteege@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 killer applications?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:51:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88a477560411170851681c3959@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e0dd08a5bd8022ad8760b54e360128d@coraid.com>
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:33:57 -0500, Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> wrote:
> unique features of Plan 9. Or, to put it another way, Who are the
> users and what are the benefits of Plan 9 features to them that they
> couldn't get any where else.
As Ronald says, plan9 offers most benefit to researchers, students and
developers. In my case I really like it because it is a system. I have
had enough from this supercharged pseudo systems with thousands of not
working/cooperating applications. Today it is really hard to get any
benefit from a traditional system. They all have to many ballast from
the past, to many bells and whistles, to many bugs and to many
marketing droids.
I'm not a developer or a researcher but for me, there is no
alternative solution today. Maybe it is the "power of textfiles" or
some kind of zen. I hope there are enough "good guys" out there to
keep it alive. Otherwise I must throw my computers out of the window.
:-)
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-17 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 15:33 Brantley Coile
2004-11-17 16:51 ` Matthias Teege [this message]
2004-11-17 17:52 ` Jack Johnson
2004-11-17 18:06 ` Dave Lukes
2004-11-17 23:16 ` geoff
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Jack Johnson
2004-11-18 5:32 ` vdharani
2004-11-18 1:56 ` Tim Newsham
2004-11-18 3:54 ` Jack Johnson
2004-11-18 0:59 ` Kenji Okamoto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-17 17:25 Benjamin Huntsman
2004-11-17 20:34 ` Vester Thacker
2004-11-16 21:24 Benjamin Huntsman
2004-11-16 16:07 David Leimbach
2004-11-16 16:11 ` Fco. J. Ballesteros
2004-11-15 19:28 ` Steve Simon
2004-11-16 16:17 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-11-16 17:07 ` matt
2004-11-16 17:15 ` rog
2004-11-17 0:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-11-17 1:08 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-11-17 8:58 ` Richard Miller
2004-11-17 15:01 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-11-16 21:14 ` Jack Johnson
2004-11-16 16:37 ` Matthias Teege
2004-11-17 20:53 ` Vester Thacker
2004-11-22 20:16 ` Dan Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88a477560411170851681c3959@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mteege@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).