9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: blstuart@bellsouth.net
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] quote o' the day
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:31:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88f97e5152dcf4de29fa4128d4e4dddc@bellsouth.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09878a44d12791405e8b8b2bebb140f4@ladd.quanstro.net>

It's this kind of intellectual ugliness that makes the
teacher in me hang my head in shame.  How could
we be managing to produce a whole generation of
programmers who actually buy into that stuff?  And
it's not as if it's a fad that's getting better.  If anything
it's getting worse.  Somehow we've made it laudible
to go to any lengths to avoid writing a line of real
code and to run as far away from hardware as we
can.  That and worship at the alter of "code reuse"
have created a world where if one abstraction is
good, then 432 must be better.  If a symbol appears
that's not defined in 17 different places all surrounded
by #ifdef's, then that's not "professional."  Everyone
is afraid to point out the nudity of the XML monarch
for fear of being branded as one afraid of change.

I humbly extend my apologies for any of this that
might have been promulgated by any of my former
students :(

\end{soapbox}

BLS




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-25 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 14:08 erik quanstrom
2010-03-25 15:04 ` maht
2010-03-25 16:56   ` ron minnich
2010-03-25 17:11     ` Corey Thomasson
2010-03-25 17:15       ` maht
2010-03-25 17:26         ` Corey Thomasson
2010-03-25 17:33         ` Robert Raschke
2010-03-25 17:42       ` David Leimbach
2010-03-25 17:29     ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-25 17:31 ` blstuart [this message]
2010-03-25 16:44   ` Patrick Kelly
2010-03-25 18:31     ` blstuart
2010-03-25 18:33     ` andrey mirtchovski
2010-03-25 18:37       ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-25 18:51       ` blstuart
2010-03-25 21:17         ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2010-03-25 20:26           ` Patrick Kelly
2010-03-25 21:58           ` Tim Newsham
2010-03-25 21:21             ` Patrick Kelly
2010-03-25 22:37               ` Justin Jackson
2010-03-25 22:53                 ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-25 22:57             ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2010-03-26  0:03               ` Anthony Sorace
2010-03-26  2:16                 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2010-03-26  6:43               ` Tim Newsham
2010-03-26 13:54                 ` andrey mirtchovski
2010-03-28 23:22                   ` Jack Johnson
2010-03-26  0:36             ` Corey Thomasson
2010-03-26  9:19           ` hugo rivera
2010-03-28 23:05           ` Eris Discordia
     [not found]           ` <989B4954D6C952C13793229D@192.168.1.2>
2010-03-28 23:31             ` hiro
2010-03-28 23:41             ` Connor Lane Smith
2010-03-28 23:51   ` hiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88f97e5152dcf4de29fa4128d4e4dddc@bellsouth.net \
    --to=blstuart@bellsouth.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).