Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing

[Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com>]

Why not just port Version 7 f77 and Version 7 Ratfor?

On Mar 1, 2008, at 9:45 AM, lejatorn@gmail.com wrote:

> Hello,
>
> At work, most of the users need a fortran compiler (although almost
> none of them actually use gfortran, they prefer ifort) and some of
> them
> do parallel computation so they need MPI. If I could have at least
> those two items thanks to P9GCC, maybe I could convince some of
> them to
> work on the plan9 servers I'm slowly setting up there.
>
> As for me, I'd be pretty happy if I could have a bittorrent client
> (especially libtorrent/rtorrent, written in c++) on plan9 so it'd be
> rather nice if your P9GCC could achieve building that. But yeah, that
> one relies on auto*, configure, etc..
>
> Mathieu.
>
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 06:55:06AM +0200, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>> Before I apply some serious effort to bring P9GCC in line with the
>> latest release, I'd like to convince myself that the effort is worth
>> it.  I'm keen to catch two birds with one stone: (a) make sure that
>> version 3.0 is sufficiently functional and (b) determine how
>> useful it
>> really is.
>>
>> Please will anybody who has a Plan 9 objective that can only be
>> attained using GCC/G++ please drop me a line to let me know briefly
>> what it is?  If the whole exercise gets a lot of support, I'll
>> happily
>> set up more infrastructure to deal with it (wiki, blog, remote
>> access,
>> whatever Bell Labs would rather not do themselves).
>>
>> ++L
>>
>> PS: I prefer if you use the 9fans list, I may miss your mail if I
>> haven't already have entered your sender address in my whitelist.
>> Use
>> your discretion.
>>
>
> --
> GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net:
>
> KeyID:	| Fingerprint:
> 683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3
> --