From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <89d1e7b80508090828e25f161@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  9 Aug 2005 17:28:28 +0200
From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <garbeam@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Standalone unix port of the original rc shell
In-Reply-To: <32d987d50508090822648bd872@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <89d1e7b805080907166daf05ae@mail.gmail.com>
	<32d987d50508090822648bd872@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 755f27d0-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 8/9/05, Federico Benavento <benavento@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It doesn't depends on mk, because in my eyes the mk-based build chain
> > in p9p is rather complex.
>=20
> do you really think that?

If you only want to port 1 single tool like rc then simply yes. For
the whole p9ports the system seems adequate mostly.

Regards,
--=20
  Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361