From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <89d1e7b8050810055731ee7a9f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:57:06 +0200
From: "Anselm R. Garbe" <garbeam@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Standalone unix port of the original rc shell
In-Reply-To: <82c890d00508100543692f1986@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <89d1e7b805080907166daf05ae@mail.gmail.com>
	<eb2d3ddeb5da831b32193918f853e49a@9netics.com>
	<89d1e7b8050810030348f99ef0@mail.gmail.com>
	<82c890d0050810032916704473@mail.gmail.com>
	<89d1e7b8050810053811fc4c35@mail.gmail.com>
	<82c890d00508100543692f1986@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 759cfa42-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Hi,

On 8/10/05, Gabriel Diaz <gabidiaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, isn't programs compiled with p9p statically linked?

No, they are dynamically linked by default.

> to put a binaries repository, or do it yourself ?=20

I do. But I'm referring more to developers which want link against
lib9* to depend on saner libs, than GNU libs.
Thus binary-only stuff is only one goal.

Regards,--=20
  Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361