From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com>
	<CADSkJJUgvPSSMLkw=XvShUxXextAkQkk5mHGU36mtc1x5y+zMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADSkJJUgvPSSMLkw=XvShUxXextAkQkk5mHGU36mtc1x5y+zMA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <8A064A89-7AA3-4BDF-8F8A-51D1AA1F408F@bitblocks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Oct 2011 07:44:04 -0700
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] circular fonctions: precision?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 300e8a0c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:=20
> For Go, we started with implementations of the Plan 9 library
> algorithms but have been slowly replacing them with implementations
> of the Sun/FreeBSD algorithms for the improved accuracy.

Why not just use sun/FreeBSD functions in C? Unless of course go authors are=
 planning to specify guaranteed minimum accuracy!=