From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190709062137u3e2838a9x165a69379ab2cf55@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13426df10709061238l1e081fel101928310c9db13c@mail.gmail.com>
	<1189134549.6197.2.camel@ginkgo>
	<775b8d190709062109o1c0a64b8y55ceb79e95083ecb@mail.gmail.com>
	<56818661-B933-4FC2-9522-203075455287@orthanc.ca>
	<775b8d190709062137u3e2838a9x165a69379ab2cf55@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8DD81F9B-9ECF-4B1D-A759-E45701D82551@orthanc.ca>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
Date: Thu,  6 Sep 2007 21:43:43 -0700
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ba66cd72-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On 2007-Sep-6, at 21:37 , Bruce Ellis wrote:

> coding at home and getting something significant working
> is what i meant.  but by all means write to the list instead.

So how do you see the way out of a brk() implementation while still
coding in a pointer based environment?  Code only follows engineering.

If I even Thought About Mentioning GC, well, ... let me put up the
window shutters.