From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Jeff Sickel <jas@corpus-callosum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG3N4d8wynTACgPgQRZ3YUEK2MAt2pD0+bOGcKyYJuLkEvhGbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  8 Feb 2013 20:46:09 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8F4334F6-E73C-4E8A-B874-F4847D7C0DCA@corpus-callosum.com>
References: <09803b4d93511fdb3e2232a9759e5aa8@isd.dp.ua>
	<01b90367d1b21dd4d899771ed5189c3a@kw.quanstro.net>
	<CAG3N4d8wynTACgPgQRZ3YUEK2MAt2pD0+bOGcKyYJuLkEvhGbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] APE libsec
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 164ef8da-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Yaroslav <yarikos@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2013/2/5 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
> looks good, but i'd do libsec at the same time.
> unless you know of a compelling reason for these
> to support a different set of algorithms?
>
> Agree.
>
> /n/sources/patch/x509-oids

I really think the APE variant should be picked up as
a(n s)ed script in the mkfile.  That way we can track
a single x509.c file.