From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8a3b72fa0f98bb8e11481382e460adc8@plan9.bell-labs.com> From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] journal of really reproducable results In-Reply-To: <20040229114418.1ffadd70@garlic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-hifuifvivkjhxbemjyasjmqbtv" Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:57 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 041c0c44-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-hifuifvivkjhxbemjyasjmqbtv Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It's the IP addresses it came from. Its been pretty steadily moving off shore. I see a trend, not a blip. --upas-hifuifvivkjhxbemjyasjmqbtv Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Sat Feb 28 21:45:42 EST 2004 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Sat Feb 28 21:45:39 EST 2004 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 4B7F719CB6; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:45:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 996B719C93; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:45:21 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 073EB19C87; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:44:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from apnic.net (cumin.apnic.net [202.12.29.59]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 10A4419C5E for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:44:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from apnic.net (durian.apnic.net [202.12.29.252]) by apnic.net (8.12.8/8.12) with SMTP id i1T2iJGL016645; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:44:19 +1000 From: George Michaelson To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Cc: presotto@closedmind.org Subject: Re: [9fans] journal of really reproducable results Message-Id: <20040229114418.1ffadd70@garlic> In-Reply-To: <98045f24800faaf258629696b724155d@plan9.bell-labs.com> References: <98045f24800faaf258629696b724155d@plan9.bell-labs.com> Organization: APNIC Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws17 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6ZI) X-Fruit-Of-The-Month-Club: persimmon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AP-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.349 required=6 X-AP-Spam-Score: -100.349 (notspam) BAYES_30,USER_IN_WHITELIST X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.15 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:44:18 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on psuvax1.cse.psu.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_RFCI autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:36:24 -0500 David Presotto wrote: >Just in case anyone cares... > >I try to keep track of where my spam comes from. 6 months ago >about 60% came from the US. My last weeks figures are now only >42% US origin. The rest of the world has caught up. I think this is minor perturbation of an otherwise longterm trend. I believe its more likely to remain a primarily US sourced problem, even when expressed via Asian cable farms of hacked end hosts. is this measure who the spam came from in IP terms, or why the spam was sent? (which is the figure which usually puts it back into American jurisdiction) -George -- George Michaelson | APNIC Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064 Phone: +61 7 3858 3150 | Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 | http://www.apnic.net --upas-hifuifvivkjhxbemjyasjmqbtv--