From: EBo <ebo@sandien.com>
To: <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ttp
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:28:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a566d6213ccc61e0b989514563fd8c1@swcp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e81467881962f75936ad576810884410@coraid.com>
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:18:16 -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:56 AM, John Floren <john@jfloren.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I do not think it is acceptable to have to fork repeatedly merely
>> to
>> > efficiently read a file. Also, as far as I can tell, exactly one
>> > program (fcp) does that.
>> >
>> > Can a single process have multiple outstanding requests? My
>> > investigations indicated not, but then again I may have mis-read
>> > things.
>>
>> So, John, you don't think it's reasonable to rewrite every program a
>> la fcp? How unreasonable of you :-)
>
> "Perhaps if we built a large wooden badger..."
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:20:37 -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> alternatively, the mount driver could be rewritten.
coconuts?
EBo --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-08 8:36 s s
2011-09-08 8:51 ` hiro
2011-09-08 16:21 ` David Leimbach
2011-09-08 9:09 ` dexen deVries
2011-09-08 9:17 ` Steve Simon
2011-09-08 9:22 ` dexen deVries
2011-09-08 12:34 ` hiro
[not found] ` <CAFSF3XN_NcKfMzugkhoj2CTaBF6Gfdke0XstEjPqcjr9FswpPw@mail.gmail.c>
2011-09-08 12:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-09-08 13:04 ` dexen deVries
2011-09-08 16:24 ` David Leimbach
[not found] ` <CAJJ04x7xC4iuqm0HOzKN-Jb3FSmg8w1E+1Lc06pYaOm_diBNsQ@mail.gmail.c>
2011-09-08 16:31 ` erik quanstrom
2011-09-08 16:56 ` John Floren
2011-09-08 16:59 ` ron minnich
2011-09-08 17:18 ` David Leimbach
[not found] ` <CAP6exYJSScKcavDvR55KqJyG5-GphLQxV_+-WuwzgU3CH0pV8w@mail.gmail.c>
2011-09-08 17:20 ` erik quanstrom
2011-09-08 17:28 ` EBo [this message]
2011-09-08 19:44 ` Bakul Shah
2011-09-08 20:14 ` John Floren
2011-09-08 20:35 ` Bakul Shah
2011-09-08 20:43 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2011-09-08 22:49 ` Bruce Ellis
2011-09-08 23:19 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2011-09-08 23:29 ` ron minnich
2011-09-08 23:48 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2011-09-09 0:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
[not found] ` <CAP6exYKARAZWWWXfK6myj+y47k3XmNnyF4z17zuHOZHczxDOhw@mail.gmail.c>
2011-09-08 23:32 ` erik quanstrom
2011-09-08 23:51 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2011-09-09 8:13 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-09-09 9:26 ` Bruce Ellis
2011-09-09 9:36 ` dexen deVries
2011-09-09 11:26 ` Bruce Ellis
2011-09-08 20:18 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a566d6213ccc61e0b989514563fd8c1@swcp.com \
--to=ebo@sandien.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).