From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8b143ed2757a23aff00e66cc2ab6251f@akira.nop.cx> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] acme + mh From: Tim Wiess Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:04:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: f5b9a41e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > can you cat /mail/fs/mbox/113/subject? > > On Mon Feb 6 10:32:25 CST 2006, tim@nop.cx wrote: >> >> i've always used mh for mail on unix. i like it, as it gives you >> many of the same benefits to having a fs interface to your mail >> that upas/fs does. >> >> tim no and i wasn't suggesting that mh is capable of providing as a rich an interface as upas/fs. just that it is what i prefer when i can't use upas/fs, since people were asking. and Russ was wondering if he was the only one around here using it. :)