From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8ba1956a9b92658e6e3c216f3cc5b3cc@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] making emalloc a library function
From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20040307113209.GA18849@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  7 Mar 2004 08:37:46 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1ed42b20-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

deja vu...  anyone looking to add e* functions to a library should
read the 'same functions everywhere' thread started almost exactly
a year ago.  contains some good arguments against it.

andrey