From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8cb4718761b0024730026c919e1d5a3a@davidashen.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] UN to fund linux for the 3rd world Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:54:57 +0500 From: dvd@davidashen.net In-Reply-To: <9630f037594241e95e7f99a025d54d9d@proxima.alt.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: dc576ec8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 For me, as for somebody who uses computers actively enough, a good OS is one that helps solve my everyday tasks efficiently without falling into the trap of following the fashion of useless stupid features forced upon us by commercial hardware vendors so that we always by faster computers. Linux is indistinguishable from Windows. http://blogs.sun.com/roller/comments/dbaigent/Weblog/the_linux_ui_that_has It is just another bloated OS with unstable kernel and bad performance. Plan 9 is nice, but has numerous bugs here and there which need constant fixing to get it work for my needs (I was fixing a couple per week during my last intercourse with this OS -- the first one was in mid-nineties; it was unusable at that time). It is here to prove its own superiority, not to serve as a tool. 4.4BSD family is the least inconvenient among usable ones. They still don't want to be just another VMS Personal Edition (while Linux is there already, with a lonely but fading exception of Debian); and they provide environment convenient enough to do everyday's work. For the everyday work of mine, a BSD is the tool (including my Fujitsu T1120 subnotebook with FreeBSD on it), and the rest of the zoo (Debian, Win 2000, Plan 9, Solaris) are test platforms. It is better than Plan 9 because I don't have to debug its kernel to do my day-to-day application programming; better than a recent Linux because I don't have to adjust my code to performance traps of the process scheduler and filesystem idiocy; and it provides a good alternative to many bloated GNU unixish tools. Win2000 would be nice if it didn't inherit all the faults of VMS along with some of its advantages. David