From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40608311419s73e6e6e1g28b67681cfef4da4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:19:33 +0200 From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] recent bitsy kernel deployment? In-Reply-To: <200608312115.k7VLFWx02413@demeter.cs.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200608312115.k7VLFWx02413@demeter.cs.utwente.nl> Topicbox-Message-UUID: acaf0f92-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 mine has been sitting idle in a drawer for years now. On 8/31/06, Axel Belinfante wrote: > just wondering if the bitsy code has been exercised recently. > it has been a while since I last updated the bitsy, and I only > recently used it again after a long period of non-usage. > > unfortunately I 'stored' mine switched on (don't do that!!) which harmed > its battery (now replaced) and probably also the sleeve battery. > > it looks like /dev/battery could be made to report slightly more about > the battery status e.g. about the sleeve one, but to add that I need > to rebuild the kernel and probably the apps too (to keep them in sync). > > since uploading over the wavelan is much easier than via the cradle, > I would feel slighly more confortable knowing that these things > still work. (of course they do, and yeah, I can just try, but still...) > > Axel. > >