From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40610031341h4f6bd9a6y34fa0c9142b5b0c5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  3 Oct 2006 22:41:38 +0200
From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gs
In-Reply-To: <c149e38182585738606b03e2e27a478e@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8fd802a4a0bcc60a27f43346bbccf0c5@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<c149e38182585738606b03e2e27a478e@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c4a00e08-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I'm curious. any other interpreter that could be ported?

On 10/3/06, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> as tedious as waiting for gs to do something is waiting
> for db to load all its symbols to debug it not doing something.
> if they ever find another candidate for a planet to replace pluto,
> they should call it `ghostscript'.  it will be big enough to qualify.
>
> out of idle interest, why has there never been a replacement?
> is it really that hard?
>
>
>