9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] terminal + router + cable internet
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:53:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40709131053j1086c2cerf8633414febc98eb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509071940709122236w220ce05cqab193c7f4d106186@mail.gmail.com>

We have booted a diskless octopus terminal (well, with our terminal
software in the terminal,
I admit)  while at greece, keeping the files at madrid. RTTs were
>150ms. A little bit
slower than at home (which is a little bit slower than a direct lan attach).

As far as our experience goes (which is not much), latency is the real problem.


On 9/13/07, Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com> wrote:
> i agree my experience isn't relevant to john's problem. his ping times
> are about 1/5 or less of what mine were. more significantly, the fact
> that his significant delay happens before authentication points
> towards something in the auth process (factotum+secstore).
>
> in general, though: networks have gotten faster, but not terribly much
> quicker. there's been no significant change in latency between
> machines i've been paying attention to in various parts of the US
> (mostly east coast) and western europe (mostly London) for the past 4
> years. the bandwidth (and bandwidth/$) have both improved
> significantly.
>
> (this is not true for asia, especially india, where i've seen very
> significant improvements)
>


      reply	other threads:[~2007-09-13 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-11  5:05 john
2007-09-11 11:10 ` Anthony Sorace
2007-09-11 11:41   ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-11 13:20   ` john
2007-09-11 21:23     ` Axel Belinfante
2007-09-12 11:05       ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-13  5:36         ` Anthony Sorace
2007-09-13 17:53           ` Francisco J Ballesteros [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ccc8ba40709131053j1086c2cerf8633414febc98eb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nemo@lsub.org \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).