From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40710311543g1adaed65pa3ef6c0116e8b38f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:43:30 +0100 From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] QTCTL? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8ccc8ba40710311526o4a5e55a7wf04f12844d4d4b66@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: e25cfbf8-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I was missing your point. It seems much easier that way. I shall try with QTDECENT instead of the other way around. On 10/31/07, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > QTCL would ... > > perhaps one of my points is that in the Plan 9/Inferno world, you'd > be better off marking the files you can cache, not trying to identify the ones > that you can't. one reason is the practical one of having to touch perhaps two or > maybe three important servers instead of everything. > >