From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40711181026i561c15c6w77ef72bc422d43fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:26:43 +0100 From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] /n/sources/contrib/ In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071118151745.AF4DE1E8C4D@holo.morphisms.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 004ce920-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 It's not hard. We have been doing that to keep a local "mirror" of our main file server (both use venti/fossil) On 11/18/07, erik quanstrom wrote: > why would coping the changed bits of the > active arena be so hard? is it too hard to update > the index? > > with ken's fs, copying from superblockn->w-address to > superblockn+1->waddr and recover is sufficient. > the bonus is that history works. > > - erik >