From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40811251024pd8a4fdcm600d183e5a337f78@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:24:59 +0100 From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: [9fans] omero/olive vs rio Topicbox-Message-UUID: 523d04ee-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Well, they are different things (acme, omero, rio) acme is more robust (and more used) I'd take a look to the olive(1) man page. In short, omero/olive has graphics and distributed UIs. On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: > Hello list, > > can anybody compare for me the functionality of omero/olive to rio/acme? > Can windows in the former be 'hidden'? > How does the editor in olive compare to acme? > Does the olive environment behave more coherently than rio? (I mean > all --- rio, sam, acme --- have inconsistent behaviour, which makes me > slightly uncomfortable from time to time). > Are there any other 'window managers'? (more workspaces, eg.?) > > Btw. is there a way in acme, having already something in a dot of some > at-the-instant nonactive window --- say a possible argument to the > Edit command --- to use the dot's content for an Edit command in > another window? I know that I can (re)mark it with a mouse and then > use the 2-1 chord. But without that remarking... > > Thanks > Ruda > >