From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40812010716t7df3d8e1yea259b276bf47d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:16:14 +0100 From: "Francisco J Ballesteros" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <002d446c312ddb57e1d7b35cfd7e2557@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2b047723f01b42a15645ce6091e21d9e@lsub.org> <99479be41ce7aefce589c280f6590923@coraid.com> <8ccc8ba40812010640j7f909431se0d1f7ed85bffc37@mail.gmail.com> <002d446c312ddb57e1d7b35cfd7e2557@coraid.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] How to implement a moral equivalent of automounter in Plan9? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 54eb8328-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Maybe I missunderstood. I mean that unless the server is reached in exaclty the same way (which, in general, if you want something like automount, it does not) aan is not enough. It's fine to reach the same FS on the same address when the net goes and come, but otherwise it is not IIRC. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:08 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> bns != aan >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> >> That's what bns does on Plan B. >> >> AFAIK, there's no way on Plan 9 to automate mounts making >> >> everythiing work after the FS goes away. >> >> >> > >> > aan? > > well, sure. i wasn't saying that they are the same. > > i understood your claim to be that > plan 9 has no way of automaticly remounting a fs. > aan does automaticly remount. > > - erik > >