9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Small program "PlanKey" (paraphrase of DOSKey)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:51:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40901281451r3f86c24bv5fa33e9bbd80eadc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7871fcf50901281419n3fa41bd2ye62beee686d6079f@mail.gmail.com>

2d menus won't work if there are more than, say, 4 or 6 options.
I learned that after experimenting with omero and olive.
They can be more convenient than regular menus, but you must still
limit the number of options.


On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Joel C. Salomon
<joelcsalomon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:59 AM,  <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>>> personally, i agree it makes the button 2 menu too long. i'd remove
>>> cut, paste, and probably snarf, since i almost always do them by
>>> chording anyway.
>>
>> That is a good suggestion.  Look, Prev and Next would all be useful
>> and long menus are only a problem on small screens.  I keep using
>> Snarf, I think there are some conditions when it is actually needed or
>> at least much simpler than 1-sweep, +2, +3.
>
> Here's a crazy thought: how about 2D menus?
>
>        cut
>        paste
>        snarf
> prev    plumb   next
>        send
>        scroll
>
> (Assuming plumb was the most recently used option.)
> This leaves the basic menu as-is, and adds the new options as if they
> were "mouse gestures": for "next", middle-click, move mouse a drop
> right, release; &c. I wouldn't add more than one option on either side
> of the menu, but as I've laid it out there is no more need to look at
> the menu to accomplish what you want, or think about what's there,
> than there is now.
>
> —Joel
> <ducks for cover>
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-28 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-23 10:03 pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-23 10:50 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-23 11:27   ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 11:35 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 12:56 ` roger peppe
2009-01-23 14:14   ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-26 12:41     ` cej
2009-01-26 10:31   ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:29   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  3:42     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27  4:43       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  6:35         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27  6:44           ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27 20:01           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 20:10             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:01               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:26                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:58                   ` sqweek
2009-01-27 23:42                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28  0:35                 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-28  5:59                   ` lucio
2009-01-28 19:00                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28 22:19                     ` Joel C. Salomon
2009-01-28 22:51                       ` Francisco J Ballesteros [this message]
2009-01-29  0:26                         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29  2:09                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29  8:49                             ` cej
2009-01-29 11:50                               ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-29 13:04                                 ` roger peppe
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` cej
2009-01-29 16:14                                   ` jimmy brisson
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 15:20                                   ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 16:40                                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:52                                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 17:03                                       ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 17:09                                         ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-01-27  7:09     ` Russ Cox
2009-01-27 22:12       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:25         ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:31           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:43             ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:50               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 23:11                 ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 23:40                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-28  3:15                     ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-28  7:22                     ` Eris Discordia
2009-01-27 23:01         ` sqweek
2009-01-26 10:31 ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:21 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  9:37 ` Pavel Klinkovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ccc8ba40901281451r3f86c24bv5fa33e9bbd80eadc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nemo@lsub.org \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).