From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e98f29b52209a5da0b432d55e2dd0fd2@coraid.com>
References: <df49a7370912070424j1c500c29tc97ad9f390119023@mail.gmail.com>
	<4c13fc3263294b597d499911f335ac69@terzarima.net>
	<8ccc8ba40912070435r68e58e78v3792fed2ff1cab61@mail.gmail.com>
	<e98f29b52209a5da0b432d55e2dd0fd2@coraid.com>
Date: Mon,  7 Dec 2009 17:14:02 +0100
Message-ID: <8ccc8ba40912070814o2f2c7eb9s5887a31810eab12e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] ideas for helpful system io functions
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aa5003c4-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

It seems that changing a bit fs(3) can suffice and is generic
enough for all usages required. In the end it might result in code
removed instead of adding code, but time will tell. As of today, it's
only an experiment.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
>> fs is already larger than it was, there's an experimental
>> ongoing version that knows enough of partitioning to help
>> usb and others on that respect.
>
> why not just use sdloop(3)?
>
> - erik
>
>