From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8ccdeb5909dad6522ec62a894ab86598@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:00:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAG3N4d-1A3VzHsyxSdiRG8-Q9NtYoe8xGUi6B9AVg3inR0Eq_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] SSHv2
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 71992fe0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> contrib/quanstro/root/sys/src/cmd/auth/factotum
>
> Nfactotum misses proto=mschap which is used by cifs(4) for doing NTLM.

1. Is Nfactotum the back port of factotum from p9p?

2. Any chance that these different branches could be brought together?

I note that the "9p.h" extension is trivial, I see no reason for the
Plan 9 distribution not to include it.  But the differences between
factotums are in a league of their own.  Now I appreciate the Go
authors aiming to minimise the quantity as well as the impact of
changes.

++L