From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:37:07 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <8d0df3a2306edd73b039e3ca8b211fb0@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 9front vs. 9atom Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9dba6c28-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I briefly looked at 9front and 9atom. I thought I would query this group > about the two. Is one better maintained than the other? Does one have > better hardware support than the other? i'd appreciate some feedback on the usb install process if you get a chance. http://ftp.9atom.org/other/usbinstamd64.bz2 it can be used as a live environment as well, though it's inconvienent for that, as only the minimum set of executables are included. this was done to keep the image size down to a minimum. - erik ps. 9atom.org will be down from 21:00 pm EST 15 dec to 03:00 am EST 16 dec (02:00am - 07:00am GMT) for network maintence.