From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <8df4e392c1e8408151bd27b64b524d52@quanstro.net> From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:48:16 -0600 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 236eb8ea-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i think a better route would be to build s/mime compatable signatures and encryption into upas/fs and upas/marshal so applications without a need to know would not have to know. - erik On Mon Mar 27 18:39:14 CST 2006, anothy@gmail.com wrote: > Fernan wrote: > // I am trying to get some sort of encyption. Protability between p9, linux and > // windows is a bit critical for my application ( I am paranoid ). > > pgp or gpg would be nice for portability, as well as for other things, > like signing mail. in the mean time, inferno's 'idea' performs the > IDEA encryption, which i believe is still considered quite strong. > it's available natively on each platform inferno is (can someone > confirm windows?), as well as within inferno itself.