From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <185f72aa563835a29afa8927aed5f7f7@terzarima.net>
References: <8e04b5820912052352w304556cdufac28cc2dd3f9ffe@mail.gmail.com>
	<185f72aa563835a29afa8927aed5f7f7@terzarima.net>
Date: Sun,  6 Dec 2009 14:58:56 +0200
Message-ID: <8e04b5820912060458m22987e1bw3ccb2dcd19602c91@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" <ciprian.craciun@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc shell UNIX port repository
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a986ca40-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wro=
te:
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * who is maintaining the UNIX port of rc shell? (is it sti=
ll
>>Tig?) (if so what's the email address?)
>
> if it's Byron Rakitzis' rc, it's not a `port' to UNIX of Plan 9's rc,
> but an independent implementation, with differences in the language,
> although it's quite usable and both versions are lightweight compared to
> the current sh implementations.


    Yes, it's Byron's reimplementation. (I've misused the `port` word.)

    But then rc's port to UNIX is the one from `plan9port` project?
(http://swtch.com/plan9port)
    (And if so, can I build and use it independent of the rest of the tools=
?)

    Thanks,
    Ciprian.