From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8e077f5ac8522f068a77a6d94d27794f@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  4 Dec 2008 10:16:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <df49a7370812040656o61714cc6x77961d50ad2c1d5d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] initialization of anonymous structs.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 58f709f6-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Sape Mullender
> <sape@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> B bvar = {
>>        .B = {
>>                .a1 = 2,
>>                .b1 = 2,
>>        },
>> };
>
> that doesn't work for me.
> i get:
> x.c:18 structure element not found B
> x.c:18 more initializers than structure: bvar
>
> changing the .B to .A doesn't work either, nor does
> {.A = {.a1 = 3}, .b1 = 4}
> which intuitively (without looking at the compiler code) seems the
> most likely to work...

seems like a subtle compiler nit (i hope i'm not out-of-date
again), this initialization does work

B bvar = {
	{.a1 = 1,},
	.b1 = 1,
};

the {} fix the problem but should not be necessary.

- erik