From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8e0ee8fda6f83179664177ba94075f51@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet/auth question
In-Reply-To: <66615df7.0302130751.377adcb4@posting.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-wgelpvipqvxgtafzemovuaozgq"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:13:07 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5c475600-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-wgelpvipqvxgtafzemovuaozgq
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It looks fine.
You have netkey binaries for linux windows and palm OS. They're nice
to telnet from remote systems. Use google to locate them (I think they're
at forsyth's site but I'm not sure).
--upas-wgelpvipqvxgtafzemovuaozgq
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Thu Feb 13 17:06:29 MET 2003
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.30.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 6DB8319A71; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:06:15 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from mercury.bath.ac.uk (mercury.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.81])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0286419980
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:05:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from news by mercury.bath.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 18jLqD-0002nf-00
	for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:04:01 +0000
Received: from GATEWAY by bath.ac.uk with netnews
	for 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu)
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Will <collumww@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <66615df7.0302130751.377adcb4@posting.google.com>
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [9fans] telnet/auth question
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:03:55 GMT

In telneting (or con'ing) into a my plan-9 auth server from unix, I
get the securenet challenge/response thing. This seems to match the
securenet man page. I also get the challenge/response prompts when I
attempt to telnet in from a plan-9 machine. Is this correct?

Somewhat related: cpu and auth/login work fine and give the plan-9
authorization prompts as expected.

Thanks to all,

and to the person who asked why use plan-9: Don't ever stop learning
new things. It keeps life much more interesting.

Will
--upas-wgelpvipqvxgtafzemovuaozgq--