From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:54:22 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <8ebc37060e76b6ffcb047cdb6f3c0d26@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <201210180731.q9I7VFiR011300@freefriends.org>
References: <201210171949.q9HJnfon003990@skeeve.com>
	<20121017200938.198DB12BB12E@r-36.net>
	<108cc49f0db0ffc6d5f6fa4c40a443ac@kw.quanstro.net>
	<201210180731.q9I7VFiR011300@freefriends.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bf778d88-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> >
> > poor special effects?
> >
> > - erik
>
> The Plan 9 desktop was never aimed at the consumer market, which is
[...]

that was supposed to be a switcheroo, not a comment on plan 9 graphics
or the importance of graphics.

sorry.

- erik