From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8ebdd0a1e3593da7c194cefea0df1773@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:52:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30806100841x33ce211dp76c9d44b02a68cce@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] usbohci in pccpuf
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9bfbba8-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>  Pretty sure you're right. This situation looks to me like one that
> could be avoided by replacing 9load with a proper kernel - otherwise
> we'd have to teach 9load about usb, no?

evidently on this hardware at least, usb legacy is disabled
when the os probes the usb hardware.  so no, 9load ignoring
usb would not be a problem in this case.

(the authid &c questions happen after the kernel is loaded.)

- erik