From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:41:31 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <8ef53006e61a397fea6f27e9ae7fc2c3@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGGHmKEuQt70bAA=q=SBWs2B+xuNQZ1137LwMA7r0aKFdUzRJA@mail.gmail.c>
References: <CAJJ04x6KLGjOSFYHXQp7P+7RZBWJF1NAdFq9+tA8oj1dAy5cWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGGHmKEuQt70bAA=q=SBWs2B+xuNQZ1137LwMA7r0aKFdUzRJA@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on ESX?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6fe90ee0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Yes it's been done and it works fairly well, though you need to avoid
> use of aux/vmware*. The biggest issue is that fossil tends to be
> fairly unstable when mixed with sdmylex and use of more than one vcpu
> results in some rather undesirable behavior of the spinning variety.

kfs certainly is a trusty warhorse.  did you experiment with cwfs?

- erik