From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8f92fa4085dec371009c0d0aef2de2dc@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port libdraw
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:39:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e6050112161638f667e9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2cd846a6-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>SDL isn't as rigid as you might think.

i wasn't criticising its rigidity, so much as scope.
even then, i wasn't criticising the scope, so much as
observing that it's really a different plan9port (portability layer), so
if you use SDL to port plan9port, then you've got
an extra portability layer in the way.  English as She is Spoke.
perhaps the analogy is porting things to plan 9 using APE.