From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:48:48 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <8fc1225a851987af9adb8e35061af18d@coraid.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] =?utf-8?b?z4Bw?= Topicbox-Message-UUID: 652ff316-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Oct 14 17:21:35 EDT 2010, lucho@ionkov.net wrote: > It can't be dealt with the current protocol. It doesn't guarantee that > Topen will be executed once Twalk is done. So can get Rerrors even if > Twalk succeeds. exactly. a set of outstanding can be overlapped in the current protocol iff there are no ordering dependencies in the set. so in particular, overlapped reads/writes on files that respect offets are always overlappable as are reads/writes of different files. - erik