From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8fdfc0df76e12f4f3e0a58368e2a816b@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] debugging help asked for
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:03:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <9e6e4ac20cc7b2bdad26436c68e9c507@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6f47483a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> that often happens when a function that returns double has no external declaration in scope where it's used,
> 
> hang on: perhaps that only causes stack overflow.  oh well, now you know not to do it in any case.

i've checked now: that case does give stack overflow.

stack underflow will result if you declare a function as returning double in the caller, but it doesn't actually do that,
perhaps it's void or int.