From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:26:51 -0400 To: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de, 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <8fe2b6dcc8149dd3b8d20ff73a7034be@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] devmnt crash, fix. Topicbox-Message-UUID: ae2a119a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Aug 22 15:56:43 EDT 2012, cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > i think this is not so mutch mntflushfree() / mntqrm(), but when we > complete a request for someone else (q != r) and we release m, > the other proc could indeed be woken up already freeing the rpc > while we are are trying to wakeup on that "done with" rpc? that's what i ment. - erik