From: Wladimir Mutel <mwg@alkar.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. ... yet.
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:49:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8k1f57$1a9r$1@pandora.alkar.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39634553.4B2EC94A@cybercafe.com.ua>
Alt <alter@cybercafe.com.ua> wrote:
> But ... it's do not allow my requairements, at the moment.
Yes, exactly, you want from this OS to give you something it never
promised to have.
> Plan-9 is olded ! :(
'Obsolete', you mean ? Not more obsolete than Unix is.
Use NT if you eager for smth 'New' :>
> I feels sorry, that haven't find it few years ago. :(
> What I would like to see ?
> 1. Absolutely new User Interface.
> 2. Multidimensional information resources (files) system.
> 3. New World-Wide (Global) information storage, and its search
> technology.
> 4. Technologies of dynamic recompilation of code.
Brrrr... Why do you suspect Plan9 to provide you with this ?
You should create all this by yourself under any OS.
Or you may switch to any OS that has these facilities now.
> Many other things which about I criticized UNIX, yet done in Plan-9.
Plan9 is not 'better Unix', as FAQ reads.
Its architecture and facilities implied by one yet have to be
researched by you. Somewhere it is completely non-UNIX (and of
course it does not give you topics 1..4 right out of the box) !
(p.s. - and learn English better, please :>)
--
mwg@alkar.net, 340044, 7442333, 7786458 - Владимир Мутель
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-06 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-05 16:12 [9fans] " Alt
2000-07-06 8:47 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-07 12:29 ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-06 8:49 ` Wladimir Mutel [this message]
2000-07-07 8:33 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. " Alt
2000-07-07 11:02 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 15:04 ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:20 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-10 9:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-12 9:31 ` Alt
2000-07-06 10:38 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. " Artem 'Thomas' Hlushko
2000-07-07 8:32 ` Alt
2000-07-07 10:51 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 14:20 ` Alt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='8k1f57$1a9r$1@pandora.alkar.net' \
--to=mwg@alkar.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).