9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wladimir Mutel <mwg@alkar.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. ... yet.
Date: Thu,  6 Jul 2000 08:49:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8k1f57$1a9r$1@pandora.alkar.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39634553.4B2EC94A@cybercafe.com.ua>

Alt <alter@cybercafe.com.ua> wrote:

> But ... it's do not allow my requairements, at the moment.

	Yes, exactly, you want from this OS to give you something it never
	promised to have.

> Plan-9 is olded ! :(

	'Obsolete', you mean ? Not more obsolete than Unix is.
	Use NT if you eager for smth 'New' :>

> I feels sorry, that haven't find it few years ago. :(

> What I would like to see ?
> 1. Absolutely new User Interface.
> 2. Multidimensional information resources (files) system.
> 3. New World-Wide (Global) information storage, and its search
> technology.
> 4. Technologies of dynamic recompilation of code.

	Brrrr... Why do you suspect Plan9 to provide you with this ?
	You should create all this by yourself under any OS.
	Or you may switch to any OS that has these facilities now.

> Many other things which about I criticized UNIX, yet done in Plan-9.

	Plan9 is not 'better Unix', as FAQ reads.
	Its architecture and facilities implied by one yet have to be
	researched by you. Somewhere it is completely non-UNIX (and of
	course it does not give you topics 1..4 right out of the box) !

	(p.s. - and learn English better, please :>)

--
mwg@alkar.net, 340044, 7442333, 7786458 - Владимир Мутель


  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-07-06  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-05 16:12 [9fans] " Alt
2000-07-06  8:47 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-07 12:29   ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:01     ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-06  8:49 ` Wladimir Mutel [this message]
2000-07-07  8:33   ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. " Alt
2000-07-07 11:02     ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 15:04       ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:20         ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-10  9:55         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-12  9:31           ` Alt
2000-07-06 10:38 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. " Artem 'Thomas' Hlushko
2000-07-07  8:32   ` Alt
2000-07-07 10:51     ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 14:20       ` Alt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='8k1f57$1a9r$1@pandora.alkar.net' \
    --to=mwg@alkar.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).