From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:49:34 +0000 From: Wladimir Mutel Message-ID: <8k1f57$1a9r$1@pandora.alkar.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r References: <39634553.4B2EC94A@cybercafe.com.ua> Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. ... yet. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: d4a3071e-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Alt wrote: > But ... it's do not allow my requairements, at the moment. Yes, exactly, you want from this OS to give you something it never promised to have. > Plan-9 is olded ! :( 'Obsolete', you mean ? Not more obsolete than Unix is. Use NT if you eager for smth 'New' :> > I feels sorry, that haven't find it few years ago. :( > What I would like to see ? > 1. Absolutely new User Interface. > 2. Multidimensional information resources (files) system. > 3. New World-Wide (Global) information storage, and its search > technology. > 4. Technologies of dynamic recompilation of code. Brrrr... Why do you suspect Plan9 to provide you with this ? You should create all this by yourself under any OS. Or you may switch to any OS that has these facilities now. > Many other things which about I criticized UNIX, yet done in Plan-9. Plan9 is not 'better Unix', as FAQ reads. Its architecture and facilities implied by one yet have to be researched by you. Somewhere it is completely non-UNIX (and of course it does not give you topics 1..4 right out of the box) ! (p.s. - and learn English better, please :>) -- mwg@alkar.net, 340044, 7442333, 7786458 - Владимир Мутель