9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wladimir Mutel <mwg@alkar.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. ... yet.
Date: Fri,  7 Jul 2000 16:20:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8k4us1$1h9q$1@pandora.alkar.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3965D3F5.832E19D4@cybercafe.com.ua>

Alt <alter@cybercafe.com.ua> wrote:

>> > However, Plan-9 have UNIX-like user interface.

>>         Where ? In command-line level - perhaps.

> Yes.
> Why I have to write echo "reboot" > reboot ?
> I prefer to write
> this.reboot = reboot

	Plan9 had not yet accumulated enough complicacy to manage it by C++
	or other OO- means. I was wondering too why there is no C++ in Plan9 
	base. I realized gradually that with low and well-organized Plan9 
	complexity, plain C is enough for it, just like it was for Unix at 
	the beginning.

>>         Hope, you do not mean 'acme' or 'plumbing'
>>         ideas are Unix-like ? :>

> It is very small step.

	Too large steps may be destructive too.

>> >> > What I would like to see ?
>> >> > 1. Absolutely new User Interface.
>> >> > 2. Multidimensional information resources (files) system.
>> >> > 3. New World-Wide (Global) information storage, and its search
>> >> > technology.
>> >> > 4. Technologies of dynamic recompilation of code.

> UNIX is not an OS yet, it's un ideology.
> and I view at the Plan9 as a pretender to be a ground of the new ideology.

	Yes Plan9 is revolutionary in ideology. But not in aspects 1..4 you
	would like to see there.

--
mwg@alkar.net, 340044, 7442333, 7786458 - Владимир Мутель


  reply	other threads:[~2000-07-07 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-05 16:12 [9fans] Plan-9 is too archic. " Alt
2000-07-06  8:47 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-07 12:29   ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:01     ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-06  8:49 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07  8:33   ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. " Alt
2000-07-07 11:02     ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 15:04       ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:20         ` Wladimir Mutel [this message]
2000-07-10  9:55         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-12  9:31           ` Alt
2000-07-06 10:38 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. " Artem 'Thomas' Hlushko
2000-07-07  8:32   ` Alt
2000-07-07 10:51     ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 14:20       ` Alt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='8k4us1$1h9q$1@pandora.alkar.net' \
    --to=mwg@alkar.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).