From: Wladimir Mutel <mwg@alkar.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. ... yet.
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:20:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8k4us1$1h9q$1@pandora.alkar.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3965D3F5.832E19D4@cybercafe.com.ua>
Alt <alter@cybercafe.com.ua> wrote:
>> > However, Plan-9 have UNIX-like user interface.
>> Where ? In command-line level - perhaps.
> Yes.
> Why I have to write echo "reboot" > reboot ?
> I prefer to write
> this.reboot = reboot
Plan9 had not yet accumulated enough complicacy to manage it by C++
or other OO- means. I was wondering too why there is no C++ in Plan9
base. I realized gradually that with low and well-organized Plan9
complexity, plain C is enough for it, just like it was for Unix at
the beginning.
>> Hope, you do not mean 'acme' or 'plumbing'
>> ideas are Unix-like ? :>
> It is very small step.
Too large steps may be destructive too.
>> >> > What I would like to see ?
>> >> > 1. Absolutely new User Interface.
>> >> > 2. Multidimensional information resources (files) system.
>> >> > 3. New World-Wide (Global) information storage, and its search
>> >> > technology.
>> >> > 4. Technologies of dynamic recompilation of code.
> UNIX is not an OS yet, it's un ideology.
> and I view at the Plan9 as a pretender to be a ground of the new ideology.
Yes Plan9 is revolutionary in ideology. But not in aspects 1..4 you
would like to see there.
--
mwg@alkar.net, 340044, 7442333, 7786458 - Владимир Мутель
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-07 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-05 16:12 [9fans] Plan-9 is too archic. " Alt
2000-07-06 8:47 ` [9fans] " Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-07 12:29 ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:01 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-06 8:49 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 8:33 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archaic. " Alt
2000-07-07 11:02 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 15:04 ` Alt
2000-07-07 16:20 ` Wladimir Mutel [this message]
2000-07-10 9:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-12 9:31 ` Alt
2000-07-06 10:38 ` [9fans] Re: Plan-9 is too archic. " Artem 'Thomas' Hlushko
2000-07-07 8:32 ` Alt
2000-07-07 10:51 ` Wladimir Mutel
2000-07-07 14:20 ` Alt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='8k4us1$1h9q$1@pandora.alkar.net' \
--to=mwg@alkar.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).