From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@9fans.net Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:54:34 +0000 From: Balwinder S Dheeman Message-ID: <8oqsn9xcur.ln2@news.homelinux.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2522920406.enqueue@as-laptop>, <0031c5cf57e92ce48e169455b02639be@quintile.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] c++ Topicbox-Message-UUID: ddf4f368-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 11/20/2012 03:42 PM, Steve Simon wrote: >> How do you studiously not do something? Doesn't the imply working >> hard at something? > > Indeed, everything I did read about Go made it look very attractive so I am ignoring it > as I know myself. If I read more I will start to get annoyed that I am wasting my time learning C++ > when Go is a much better solution. Its the sam reason I use plan9 and not Windows/Linux/OSX etc. > > its a backhanded compliment to the Go authors that I must not look at their work (yet). Me, OTOH, would like see Go go out of fashion ASAP; What's so special a C/C++ programmer can't do what she/he can do with Go? -- Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman (http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)