From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:26:58 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <900a10b82860e0680435c4ceaaa58b03@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOCRf5VZhH23mZEOUHDvjDfmx79s=u_27OpzwnavCp6s4BXV7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53295712.1050505@gmail.com>
	<CAOCRf5VZUFj7RxAo8QeP+TwPxW8zyygEx1D8Wi42iUnPtUxWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANZw+5f1EkfiAMtTs9LrorLMqkGkVGercyy3H3YrCSQ_eypeVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM6ozu5RWPv_SzUdynUjgPGOJ9D0tC8H=k08qof08nHdCJ74EQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEAzY39va+9K9+cGJZzra3TT2-LQL9A397YvcFya2zOwrttKaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<db83a632f1edae42784ced3ecee857c1@mikro.quanstro.net>
	<CAOCRf5VZhH23mZEOUHDvjDfmx79s=u_27OpzwnavCp6s4BXV7w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC proposal: Alternative window system
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc02d75a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed Mar 19 11:01:54 EDT 2014, begnoc@gmail.com wrote:
> I think Plan B / Octopus's omero does these things already. I'm still
> voting for touch interface

we don't drive any touch hardware, so in the interest of success, i would
not be interested in a gsoc project that required as step 0: identify,
purchase and write driver for enabling hardware.

next year if there is such a hardware driver, and we're accepted into
gsoc, it might be interesting.  especially if a student signs up for it.

- erik