From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20160218113017.GB2756@polynum.com> <49010da5-9c4e-4399-8fbe-e4dae715063f@email.android.com> <20160219125246.GA345@polynum.com> <7cdd0c6898558feb7648d8d0bd356157@lilly.quanstro.net> <20160220103225.GA42@polynum.com> From: Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160220103225.GA42@polynum.com> Message-Id: <901BC05C-A1C3-43F2-88F1-C96B28C00CD5@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:23:29 +0100 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [9fans] rtl8169 gbe slow Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8618972e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Is your MTU higher that 1500? That might be able to mess things up over the i= nternet. Best regards, Kenny Levinsen > On 20. feb. 2016, at 11.32, tlaronde@polynum.com wrote: >=20 > I have compared downloading a file (via ftpfs) on the LAN, and > downloading it from the WAN. >=20 > On the LAN, I get the 10MB file in less than a 1s (this is normal since > the node I download from has only a 100Mb ethernet). >=20 > On the WAN, it takes 6 minutes (with hget). >=20 > My conclusion is that the card device (driver) is not at fault but that > something is wrong along the path when I get through the gateway. >=20 > Has somebody an idea about what I may do wrong or what could cause such > a cost on the gateway. >=20 > I have set IPv6 on the gateway: no difference. I have tried to disable > IPv6 on the ether: no difference.=20 >=20 > ip/traceroute to the outside server shows results that are on par > with what I get from NetBSD on this very node where I run also > plan9. >=20 > "Something" is obviously wrong. But "what" is less obvious (at least to > me). >=20 > --=20 > Thierry Laronde > http://www.kergis.com/ > http://www.arts-po.fr/ > Key fingerprint =3D 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C >=20