From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <901ffe144ad4644ef2996d3de65bae17@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] sam command language
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <aa78fa42c63110097e9d4ba953331aea@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  8 Oct 2003 15:44:16 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 67670e62-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> feature.  otherwise you couldn't undo to the point it was clean.

hmm.  "was clean" is quite different from "is clean".  (both are
useful, but they're orthogonal to one another).

perhaps the 'f' line could indicate both (e.g.  with an extra
space/backquote to indicate "is clean").

while on the subject of undo/redo, would it be terrible to have a
"Redoall" command? as when clicking repetitively on "Redo" i
invariably click one too many times (whereupon the "Redo" has replaced
itself by "Put") and write the file unintentionally, sometimes with
annoying results.