From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <9044d05fde9cdc14ad57d9abe18152b2@gandalf.orthanc.ca>
To: weigelt@metux.de, 9fans@9fans.net
From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)"  <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:26:04 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20101113184343.GA17279@nibiru.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] opposite of bloom filter
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7c662fb4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The purpose is allowing an spooling (store+forward) mail relay
> to learn which addresses are not accepted by the actual maildrop
> (which is connected by an uucp-link, so no direct smtp chat),
> to get rid of the thousands silly error bounces from brute force
> attacks on email addresses.

Very(!) interesting approach to this.  I still transfer large chunks
of my mail over UUCP, so this is a problem I face daily.  I'd appreciate
being kept in the loop for anything you find out. (And collaborating on
a solution.)

--lyndon