From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <90e9f70b35a4d82d4287fee617a89392@isd.dp.ua>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: yaroslav <yarikos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:20:58 +0300
In-Reply-To: <58c8e88cdc5afad38233c3ab4bb74344@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P/Styx: streaming / contigious reading
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d0a4048-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > > did anyone already investigate how an streaming (w/o expicit read
> > > requests) could be done via 9P ?
> >
> > Why don't you use a protocol more suitable for high latencies?
>
> i think the problem rather is the tradition of having one
> outstanding message per fid.  as far as i can tell, 9p doesn't
> have this restriction.  we just use it that way.

Maybe the way fcp(1) works is the answer?

-- Yaroslav