From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  3 Mar 2013 14:31:07 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <911ca24da6d95f3c9cd5145a6fe4aad8@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130303192824.GA14748@intma.in>
References: <a06335363aab79fedaf81d00f4fb3824@yourdomain.dom>
	<f42e90785442e828bd3a1da78baa3b67@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20130303191130.GA13319@intma.in>
	<a5e27605955857e1237d19b466482b13@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20130303192824.GA14748@intma.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] doing a native awk port (was Re: Bug in print(2) g verb)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2303937e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Mar  3 14:29:15 EST 2013, khm-9@intma.in wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:18:11PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > awk is designed for a posix environment.
>
> bullshit.  was ls also designed for a posix environment?  awk is at
> least ten years older than posix.

should i say "the current ot awk source"?  it's certainly not
designed for plan 9.

- erik